​Studio ​Ambiguous​​​​
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Ethos
    • Team
    • Contact
  • Thesis / Writings
  • Blog
  • Things
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Ethos
    • Team
    • Contact
  • Thesis / Writings
  • Blog
  • Things

​Whose Architect?

6/7/2018

0 Comments

 

Perhaps the overriding myth is that of the architect as a hero. Serving the same powers that it strives to critique, architecture is condemned to a perpetual conflict of interest. Together, architects, clients, politicians, and consultants make up an embroiled world in which it is forever unclear who calls the shots.- Reinier de Graaf

When it becomes job search time for an architect, in order to get an overview of firms and potential internships, the search starts where most searches these days start, Google. That search may lead to some other websites that specialize in job or internship postings, but something interesting continues to happen when using the keyword ‘architect’. Intermixed with a few listings that meet the generally expected criteria are companies like IBM, Google, and others specializing within the technology sector. Facebook lists ‘Optical Systems Architect’ and ‘Solutions Architect’ on their careers page, Google has an opening for a ‘Cloud Architect’, and Apple is searching for an ‘Imaging and Vision Architect’ along with 600 listed jobs that appear with the keyword ‘architect’. Although the amount of tech jobs, the search for that elusive job goes on, unknowingly witnessing a phenomenon that seems to raise profound questions about architecture and the architect in today’s world and in the future.

​Whose systems are dependent on who? Does space in the city have value if it does not have Wi-Fi or other means to activate social media services, regardless of built architecture?  Which architects really influence and shape our environments? 
0 Comments

who is in control?

5/29/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Modernism
Picture
Post Modernism
Picture
?
Conceptual series exploring the historical evolution of  how users engage advertising within the public domain. 

The following is an excerpt from the conclusion of my thesis, Digital is Physical: The Future of User Agency and Design Within the Public Domain. Explore more in the "Thesis and Writings" section. 

The issue is not private companies participating in the public domain. Disneyland is Disneyland. A shopping mall is a shopping mall. A billboard is a billboard. An Apple store is not a Town Square. A future public domain built on false rhetoric and subversive technology must be critically questioned from the standpoint of architecture urbanism and most importantly by all users of the city. Ultimately, it is crucial that users maintain the agency of choice and freedom within the public domain.

When users experience of the city is controlled, filtered, influenced, or manipulated the chance encounters and serendipity of the public domain are gone. Users are not only isolated, but unable to no longer be exposed to different opinions and diversity. In some ways, that deepens social divides, isolation, and polarization of communities.

Not everything these companies do is bad. There are many examples of these platforms and devices connecting and enabling communities world-wide to have a voice on a global scale. Political engagement that happens in digital space is now playing out in physical space. The same happens with casual social interaction with added connectivity and accessibility for those with the software. For all the good, these technologies clearly come with consequences that must be critically considered before they are given free reign within the public domain.

I firmly stand with the idea that we must as citizens and designers fight to retain agency and control within these spaces within the city. This relationship will continue to change, but as technology redefines the ‘rules of engagement’ within the public domain the fundamental aspects of the public domain cannot be forgotten. A public domain that trades serendipity, freedom, and user agency for control, ubiquity, and isolation that is defined by technology companies must not be the future of the city. There will be ways the digital and physical realms can coexist, but designers, users, and policymakers must critically ask what the function of the public domain is in the future vision of cities.



​Martijn De. Waal, The City as Interface: How Digital Media Are Changing the City (Rotterdam: NAI Uitgevers/Publishers Stichting, 2014)
0 Comments

    Categories

    All
    432 Park Avenue
    Adam Wiese Thesis
    Advertising
    Affordable
    Albert Pope
    Alex Moore
    Alex Moore Thesis
    American Modernism
    Apple
    Arch Daily
    Archigram
    Architects
    Architecture
    Architecture Job
    Archizoom
    Art
    Bad Taste
    Billboard
    Chaos
    Christian De Portzamparc
    City
    City Of The Captive Globe
    Collage
    Communication
    Contradiction
    Cutouts
    Delirious New York
    Design
    Digital
    Digital Media
    Digital Mortuary
    Disney
    Disneyland
    Double Life
    Facebook
    Fake Architecture
    Filip Dujardin
    Filtering
    Filters
    Follow
    Four Walls And A Roof
    Fringe Condition
    Generic
    Generic City
    Google
    Google Street View
    Highway
    Home
    Housing
    Humor
    I Am Art
    Ideal
    Image
    Industrial Revitalism
    Influencers
    Intention
    Job
    Juxtaposed
    Ladders
    Lars Lerup
    Learning From Las Vegas
    Like
    Madelon Vriesendorp
    Manifesto
    Marcel Duchamp
    Media
    Medium
    Michael Sorkin
    Modern
    Modernism
    Nebraska
    New Urban Crisis
    New York
    New York City
    No Stop City
    OMA
    Omaha
    Past/In/On Residence
    Past Residence
    Photograph
    Photoshop
    Pier Vittorio Aureli
    Political
    Post Internet
    Post Modernism
    Public Domain
    Public Housing
    Public Space
    Public Transit
    Question
    Readymade
    Reality
    Reinier De Graaf
    Rem Koolhaas
    Representation
    Revit
    Ryan Trecartin
    Significance
    Smart City
    Social
    Social Media
    Social Services
    Speculation
    Standardization
    The City As A Project
    Theory
    The Re'Search
    Thesis
    Transit
    Twitter
    UFO Studio
    Urban
    Urbanism
    User
    Voluntary Prisoners
    Wealth Gap
    Whose Architect
    Writing

      Stay In Touch

    Subscribe
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.