​Studio ​Ambiguous​​​​
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Ethos
    • Team
    • Contact
  • Thesis / Writings
  • Blog
  • Things
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Ethos
    • Team
    • Contact
  • Thesis / Writings
  • Blog
  • Things

0.2_The City of Nothing

7/18/2017

0 Comments

 
"​The elephant in the room here is that in the last thirty years we have lacked a theory of the city. The city has been mapped, discussed, debated, exhibited, and photographed, but not theorized. So now we finally understand why, as early as 1997, Albert Pope opened hos book with the notion that THE CONTEMPORARY CITY IS INVISIBLE. It is invisible simply because we lack a theory; we lack urban conceptions through which we can actively think the city." - Pier Vittorio Aureli
Picture
As I have gone through my process I started basing many of my original notions off of reading by Rem Koolhaas. Over the summer that research has progressed and I am starting to put the pieces together with a few architects and urban theorists that begin to overlap on the same types of ideas that I am beginning to have with this project. These writers, Rem Koolhaas, Lars Lerup, Pier Vittorio Aureli, Albert Pope, and Michael Sorkin (to some extent) all are asking questions of the city that have gone unasked. I think their approach is very unique (it goes back to the process that I keep questioning) because they are writing about the city with an awareness of the issues that came from the moment when architecture and urban design broke away from each other.  This is important because it no long makes assumptions about architecture's place in the city. Generally they are all against this split, but others quickly assume architecture and the man made environment as the preeminent feature within the urban realm. For me, I am starting to believe that that is not the case either. While I do not know exactly why, I do believe that there is a reason that some of their most timeless writings on the city happened in the mid 90s and early 2000s.  My guess is that they were beginning to understand the real consequences of postwar development and the beginning globalization had done and what it was about to do to the contemporary city. Pier Vittorio Aureli does not only say that the city is invisible, but he also says we lack urban conceptions though which we can actively think about the city (which seems like more of a severe indictment on architecture itself). In a simple way I have thought of my studies as "understanding architecture's position within the political and economical realm", but that is assuming that architecture exists there at all. Albert Pope's Ladders may have significantly changed the trajectory for me. The idea of architecture and design being an engine for social, economic, political, and cultural change still exists, but right now it comes from a superficial approach because we do not have a way to actually conceptualize and understand the city. Rem's What Ever Happened to Urbanism and The Generic City ring truer than ever. It is time to attempt to revisit these ideas 20 years later. There is a paragraph in Whatever Happened to Urbanism that still inspires me to chase these ideas.

"If there is to be a "new urbanism" it will not be based on the twin fantasies of order and omnipotence; it will be the staging of uncertainty; it will no longer be concerned with the arrangement of more or less permanent objects but with the irrigation of territories with potential; it will not longer aim for stable configurations but for the creation of enabling field that accommodates processes that refuse to be crystallized into definite form; it will no longer be about meticulous definition, the imposition of limits, but about expanding notions, denying boundaries, not about separating and identifying entities, but about discovering unnameable hybrids." 

There is a lot there, but it is one of the most optimistic outlooks on what a city can be for people. The key to it became clear when reading Ladders, because it is not saying that better architecture is the key, actually it is more aligned with Albert Pope in asking architecture to take a secondary role in the environment. To me its no longer about asking questions about "how to better revitalize a neighborhood?" or "how to masterplan the perfect mix use development?" or even the environemntal sustainability issues of the time. Those are important, do not get me wrong, but for this project right now it is really asking about what the city has become and what it could be, the rest is just details. 


0.3_How to Make a Project About Nothing?

 "It is not built form which characterizes the city but the immense spaces over which form has no control."- Albert Pope
Picture
Albert Pope's main argument in Ladders is that postwar development of the city (centripetal and closed) has caused the contemporary city to disappear. He bases his argument off of the implosion of the grid structure that lead to closed and isolated development throughout the city and into the suburbs. This is a good place to start because the grid is foundational. Delirious New York is supposed to be organized and understood as a grid when reading it and the entire book can trace itself back to understanding architecture within the grid of Manhattan. As the grid disappears, the city does too. As the mass production of space within our environment  grows (freeways, malls, atrium, etc), urban activity is censured. Inhibiting cultural and social activity has created a city of nothing. Koolhaas's "culture of congestion" and the spontaneous nature of the city begin to align with these same ideas of closed off cities. 

I have begun to buy into the idea of the invisible city and control and censorship that the postwar city places on its people. I do not have the answer yet of where this goes, but I do think that it starts with the grid. It think it is time to attempt to conceptualize architecture as a more dynamic piece of our environment instead of slow and stagnant. It is time to throw away the preconceived notions of the separations of architecture and urbanism. It is time to question the process and do accept the outcome as the ultimate truth, but as piece to a larger puzzle of understanding. The canvas continues to become more and more blank when thinking about the city. 

Primary Working Research

Ladders- Albert Pope
Delerious New York- Rem Koolhaas
S, M, L, XL- Rem Koolhaas
The City as a Project- Pier Vittorio Aureli
After the City- Lars Lerup
All Over the Map- Michael Sorkin
Exquisite Corpse- Michael Sorkin
Learning from Las Vegas- Robert Venturi+Denise Scott Brown


Site_Omaha Nebraska

Picture
Omaha will provide a great opportunity to experiment with these ideas, and I think the direction of the current thought continue to fit the city as a site perfectly. The main reason is the distinct difference between the pre and postwar city. Also, current downtown design discussions, the Conagra campus site, Crossroads Mall, the endless suburbs, and more will provide a wide range of opportunity for experimentation and speculation. 
0 Comments

    Categories

    All
    432 Park Avenue
    Adam Wiese Thesis
    Advertising
    Affordable
    Albert Pope
    Alex Moore
    Alex Moore Thesis
    American Modernism
    Apple
    Arch Daily
    Archigram
    Architects
    Architecture
    Architecture Job
    Archizoom
    Art
    Bad Taste
    Billboard
    Chaos
    Christian De Portzamparc
    City
    City Of The Captive Globe
    Collage
    Communication
    Contradiction
    Cutouts
    Delirious New York
    Design
    Digital
    Digital Media
    Digital Mortuary
    Disney
    Disneyland
    Double Life
    Facebook
    Fake Architecture
    Filip Dujardin
    Filtering
    Filters
    Follow
    Four Walls And A Roof
    Fringe Condition
    Generic
    Generic City
    Google
    Google Street View
    Highway
    Home
    Housing
    Humor
    I Am Art
    Ideal
    Image
    Industrial Revitalism
    Influencers
    Intention
    Job
    Juxtaposed
    Ladders
    Lars Lerup
    Learning From Las Vegas
    Like
    Madelon Vriesendorp
    Manifesto
    Marcel Duchamp
    Media
    Medium
    Michael Sorkin
    Modern
    Modernism
    Nebraska
    New Urban Crisis
    New York
    New York City
    No Stop City
    OMA
    Omaha
    Past/In/On Residence
    Past Residence
    Photograph
    Photoshop
    Pier Vittorio Aureli
    Political
    Post Internet
    Post Modernism
    Public Domain
    Public Housing
    Public Space
    Public Transit
    Question
    Readymade
    Reality
    Reinier De Graaf
    Rem Koolhaas
    Representation
    Revit
    Ryan Trecartin
    Significance
    Smart City
    Social
    Social Media
    Social Services
    Speculation
    Standardization
    The City As A Project
    Theory
    The Re'Search
    Thesis
    Transit
    Twitter
    UFO Studio
    Urban
    Urbanism
    User
    Voluntary Prisoners
    Wealth Gap
    Whose Architect
    Writing

      Stay In Touch

    Subscribe
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.